Can An Obstinate and Cynical Pundit Be Fair?

I'm not a journalist. I don't approach topics with objectivity while distancing myself from any judgment. That just isn't me. I say what I think within my domain, and in other places around the Net. Often, this puts me at odds with others. Then, it begins to look like I am close-minded and resistant to allowing the presentation of opposing points of view. I assure you this is not the case.

No, I'm not going to root for something I don't believe in. However, this site, ZodiacKillerTRUTH.com was designed to present all sides of an issue. That is what I intend to do. But, that doesn't mean I'm going to withhold my own opinion. For me, that would be next to impossible. But, I'll allow for dissent. I'll allow for fair discourse on any subject worthy of such.

I realize that there are many divisions within the Zodiac research community. I don't intend to make myself a part of all of them. But, whether I agree, or disagree, I will allow for all viewpoints here at this site. This allowance is not without a few reasonable limitations. I will not allow the bashing of other sites or webmasters or anyone else who isn't a suspect in this case. The ideas, opinions, and conclusions of those persons are, of course, fair game. Topics of discussion should be on the facts and issues. Nor do I allow unmerited or irrelevant accusations against people that aren't considered suspects in this case. This includes baseless conspiracy theories and unfounded speculation. That sort of thing is not only inflammatory, but unproductive. But, one shouldn't consider this a limit to discussion, but rather an opening to a more constructive dialog.

By allowing for various points of view, I put myself, and this site, at risk to certain perceptions. It may appear at times as if I am aligning myself with persons or ideas with which I am not in agreement. This is a risk I am willing to take for open discussion. Those that are familiar with me, know better. I stand for the same things now, which I have always stood for. My beliefs haven't changed. While my sanity may be questioned at times, I'm not senile. I'm not turning over any new leaves, I'm only trying to leave no stone unturned.

I understand that not everyone will accept this invitation to open discussion. Certain parties may see it as making a deal with the Devil, so to speak. After all, I have expressed my opinions quite openly, and without much friendly restraint. I have expressed a certain amount of skepticism and I've pointed out deeds and motivations that I've found to be unwholesome. I shouldn't expect those who I have taken to task to take their chances on ground they might consider as hostile. So, I don't. However, the door is open and the odds are your favor that your side of the issues can be presented to a new audience. The only caveat is that those who disagree with that point of view get to have their say, as well. I allow those that disagree with me to speak their mind, so I'm not asking anything special of anyone else. All that I am asking for is a certain amount of trust and for visitors here to believe that I can be fair.

This why I have created the Community section of this site, located at http://ZodiackillerTRUTH.com/port

If you are a member here that wishes to expound on the Zodiac case in accordance with the terms and conditions provided here and within the Forum, contact me. I will enable the blog capabilities of your account. Anyone who abides by the rules I have set forth will be allowed, provided they accept in the same spirit in which this offer has been made.

• First and foremost, this allowance is made to promote a theory or suspect, not to detract from someone else's. The only exception allowed is if the post is a direct counter to a post authored by me. Dissent, criticism, and skepticism of anyone except me is limited to the comments and the forums, and then only where relevant.
• Blog entries are limited to one blog every 14 days. Do not abuse this feature.
• The rules outlined for the forum apply to blogging here.
• Posts should be 300 to 1500 words.
• Posts should be original. No cut and paste. No website content. No copyrighted material.
• Posts on cipher solutions must contain a recognizable key.
• No mathemagic.
• Facts. Facts. Facts. Posts should based on facts.
• No anonymous bloggers. If you're afraid to share your name, you have no business here. Sigh...No fake names.
• Your name must appear in the Title. (Post Title by FirstName Lastname)
• Blogs are subject to editing, by me, for things such as spelling and grammar, and to make sure content is within the guidelines I have set. However, It is my intention to leave the content as original as possible.
• No personal attacks. no ad-hominem.

If you wish to contribute in accordance with the above, contact me. (no pm's) Include your real name as it will appear on your post and the subject matter you wish to write about.